rapamune
Generic Name: (
Sirolimus)
Dosage Type: tablet, sugar coated rapamune
Generic Name: (
Sirolimus)
Dosage Type: solution Organization: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Rx only
WARNING:
Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development
of lymphoma may result from immunosuppression. Only physicians experienced
in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should
use Rapamune®. Patients receiving the drug should be managed
in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive
medical resources. The physician responsible for maintenance therapy should
have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient.
DESCRIPTION
Rapamune® (sirolimus) is an immunosuppressive
agent. Sirolimus is a macrocyclic lactone produced by Streptomyces
hygroscopicus. The chemical name of sirolimus (also known as rapamycin)
is (3S,6R,7E,9R,10R,12R,14S,15E,17E,19E,21S,23S,26R,27R,34aS)-9,10,12,13,14,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,32,33,34,34a-hexadecahydro-9,27-dihydroxy-3-[(1R)-2-[(1S,3R,4R)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethyl]-10,21-dimethoxy-6,8,12,14,20,26-hexamethyl-23,27-epoxy-3H-pyrido[2,1-c][1,4] oxaazacyclohentriacontine-1,5,11,28,29
(4H,6H,31H)-pentone. Its molecular
formula is C51H79NO13 and its molecular weight
is 914.2. The structural formula of sirolimus is shown below.
Sirolimus
is a white to off-white powder and is insoluble in water, but freely soluble
in benzyl alcohol, chloroform, acetone, and acetonitrile.
Rapamune® is
available for administration as an oral solution containing 1 mg/mL sirolimus.
Rapamune is also available as a white, triangular-shaped tablet containing
1-mg sirolimus, and as a yellow to beige triangular-shaped tablet containing
2-mg sirolimus.
The inactive ingredients in Rapamune® Oral
Solution are Phosal 50 PG® (phosphatidylcholine, propylene
glycol, mono- and di-glycerides, ethanol, soy fatty acids, and ascorbyl palmitate)
and polysorbate 80. Rapamune Oral Solution contains 1.5% - 2.5% ethanol.
The
inactive ingredients in Rapamune® Tablets include sucrose,
lactose, polyethylene glycol 8000, calcium sulfate, microcrystalline cellulose,
pharmaceutical glaze, talc, titanium dioxide, magnesium stearate, povidone,
poloxamer 188, polyethylene glycol 20,000, glyceryl monooleate, carnauba wax, dl-alpha tocopherol, and other ingredients.
The 2 mg dosage strength also contains iron oxide yellow 10 and iron
oxide brown 70.
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Sirolimus inhibits T lymphocyte activation and proliferation
that occurs in response to antigenic and cytokine (Interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4,
and IL-15) stimulation by a mechanism that is distinct from that of other
immunosuppressants. Sirolimus also inhibits antibody production. In cells,
sirolimus binds to the immunophilin, FK Binding Protein-12 (FKBP-12), to generate
an immunosuppressive complex. The sirolimus:FKBP-12 complex has no effect
on calcineurin activity. This complex binds to and inhibits the activation
of the mammalian Target Of Rapamycin (mTOR), a key regulatory kinase. This
inhibition suppresses cytokine-driven T-cell proliferation, inhibiting the
progression from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle.
Studies
in experimental models show that sirolimus prolongs allograft (kidney, heart,
skin, islet, small bowel, pancreatico-duodenal, and bone marrow) survival
in mice, rats, pigs, and/or primates. Sirolimus reverses acute rejection of
heart and kidney allografts in rats and prolongs the graft survival in presensitized
rats. In some studies, the immunosuppressive effect of sirolimus lasts up
to 6 months after discontinuation of therapy. This tolerization effect is
alloantigen specific.
In rodent models of autoimmune
disease, sirolimus suppresses immune-mediated events associated with systemic
lupus erythematosus, collagen-induced arthritis, autoimmune type I diabetes,
autoimmune myocarditis, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, graft-versus-host
disease, and autoimmune uveoretinitis.
Pharmacokinetics
Sirolimus pharmacokinetic activity has been determined following
oral administration in healthy subjects, pediatric patients, hepatically-impaired
patients, and renal transplant patients.
Absorption
Following administration of Rapamune® Oral
Solution, sirolimus is rapidly absorbed, with a mean time-to-peak concentration
(tmax) of approximately 1 hour after a single dose in healthy subjects
and approximately 2 hours after multiple oral doses in renal transplant recipients.
The systemic availability of sirolimus was estimated to be approximately 14%
after the administration of Rapamune Oral Solution. The mean bioavailability
of sirolimus after administration of the tablet is about 27% higher relative
to the oral solution. Sirolimus oral tablets are not bioequivalent to the
oral solution; however, clinical equivalence has been demonstrated at the
2-mg dose level. (See Clinical
Studies and DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION). Sirolimus concentrations, following
the administration of Rapamune Oral Solution to stable renal transplant patients,
are dose proportional between 3 and 12 mg/m2.
Food effects: In
22 healthy volunteers receiving Rapamune Oral Solution, a high-fat meal (861.8 kcal,
54.9% kcal from fat) altered the bioavailability characteristics of sirolimus.
Compared with fasting, a 34% decrease in the peak blood sirolimus concentration
(Cmax), a 3.5-fold increase in the time-to-peak concentration
(tmax), and a 35% increase in total exposure (AUC) was observed.
After administration of Rapamune Tablets and a high-fat meal in 24 healthy
volunteers, Cmax, tmax, and AUC showed increases of
65%, 32%, and 23%, respectively. To minimize variability, both Rapamune Oral
Solution and Tablets should be taken consistently with or without food (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Distribution
The mean (± SD) blood-to-plasma ratio of sirolimus was
36 ± 18 in stable renal allograft recipients after administration of
oral solution, indicating that sirolimus is extensively partitioned into formed
blood elements. The mean volume of distribution (Vss/F) of sirolimus
is 12 ± 8 L/kg. Sirolimus is extensively bound (approximately
92%) to human plasma proteins. In man, the binding of sirolimus was shown
mainly to be associated with serum albumin (97%), a1-acid
glycoprotein, and lipoproteins.
Metabolism
Sirolimus is a substrate for both cytochrome P450 IIIA4 (CYP3A4)
and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Sirolimus is extensively metabolized by the CYP3A4
isozyme in the intestinal wall and liver and undergoes counter-transport from
enterocytes of the small intestine into the gut lumen by the P-gp drug
efflux pump. Sirolimus is potentially recycled between enterocytes and the
gut lumen to allow continued metabolism by CYP3A4. Therefore, absorption and
subsequent elimination of systemically absorbed sirolimus may be influenced
by drugs that affect these proteins. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp increase
sirolimus concentrations. Inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp decrease sirolimus concentrations.
(See WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions and Other drug
interactions). Sirolimus is extensively metabolized by
O-demethylation and/or hydroxylation. Seven (7) major metabolites, including
hydroxy, demethyl, and hydroxydemethyl, are identifiable in whole blood. Some
of these metabolites are also detectable in plasma, fecal, and urine samples.
Glucuronide and sulfate conjugates are not present in any of the biologic
matrices. Sirolimus is the major component in human whole blood and contributes
to more than 90% of the immunosuppressive activity.
Excretion
After a single dose of [14C]sirolimus oral solution
in healthy volunteers, the majority (91%) of radioactivity was recovered from
the feces, and only a minor amount (2.2%) was excreted in urine.
Pharmacokinetics In Renal Transplant Patients
Rapamune Oral Solution: Pharmacokinetic parameters for sirolimus
oral solution given daily in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids
in renal transplant patients are summarized below based
on data collected at months 1, 3, and 6 after transplantation (Studies 1 and
2; see CLINICAL STUDIES). There were no significant differences in any of these parameters
with respect to treatment group or month.
SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC
PARAMETERS (MEAN ± SD) IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS (MULTIPLE DOSE ORAL
SOLUTION)a,b
|
|
|
Cmax,ssc |
tmax,ss |
AUCt,ssc |
CL/F/WTd |
| N |
Dose |
(ng/mL) |
(h) |
(ng•h/mL) |
(mL/h/kg) |
|
|
| 19 |
2 mg |
12.2 ± 6.2 |
3.01 ± 2.40 |
158 ± 70 |
182 ± 72 |
| 23 |
5 mg |
37.4 ± 21 |
1.84 ± 1.30 |
396 ± 193 |
221 ± 143 |
Whole blood sirolimus trough concentrations (mean ±
SD), expressed as chromatographic assay values, for the 2 mg/day and
5 mg/day dose groups were 6.9 ± 3.2 ng/mL (n = 226)
and 13.8 ± 5.9 ng/mL (n = 219), respectively (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Whole blood trough sirolimus concentrations, as measured by LC/MS/MS,
were significantly correlated (r2 = 0.96) with AUCt,ss.
Upon repeated twice daily administration without an initial loading dose in
a multiple-dose study, the average trough concentration of sirolimus increases
approximately 2 to 3-fold over the initial 6 days of therapy at which time
steady state is reached. A loading dose of 3 times the maintenance dose will
provide near steady-state concentrations within 1 day in most patients. The
mean ± SD terminal elimination half life (t½) of sirolimus
after multiple dosing in stable renal transplant patients was estimated to
be about 62 ± 16 hours.
Rapamune Tablets: Pharmacokinetic parameters for sirolimus
tablets administered daily in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids
in renal transplant patients are summarized below based
on data collected at months 1 and 3 after transplantation (Study 3; see CLINICAL STUDIES).
SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC
PARAMETERS (MEAN ± SD) IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS (MULTIPLE DOSE TABLETS)a,b
|
|
Dose |
Cmax,ssc |
tmax,ss |
AUCt,ssc |
CL/F/WTd |
| n |
(2 mg/day) |
(ng/mL) |
(h) |
(ng•h/mL) |
(mL/h/kg) |
|
|
| 17 |
Oral solution |
14.4 ± 5.3 |
2.12 ± 0.84 |
194 ± 78 |
173 ± 50 |
| 13 |
Tablets |
15.0 ± 4.9 |
3.46 ± 2.40 |
230 ± 67 |
139 ± 63 |
Whole blood sirolimus trough concentrations (mean ±
SD), expressed as chromatographic assay values, for 2 mg of oral solution
and 2 mg of tablets over 6 months, were 7.1 ± 3.5 ng/mL (n = 172)
and 7.6 ± 3.1 ng/mL (n = 179), respectively (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Whole
blood trough sirolimus concentrations, as measured by LC/MS/MS, were significantly
correlated (r2 = 0.85) with AUCt,ss. Mean whole
blood sirolimus trough concentrations in patients receiving either Rapamune
Oral Solution or Rapamune Tablets with a loading dose of three times the maintenance
dose achieved steady-state concentrations within 24 hours after the start
of dose administration.
Average Rapamune doses and sirolimus
whole blood trough concentrations for tablets administered daily in combination
with cyclosporine and following cyclosporine withdrawal, in combination with
corticosteroids in renal transplant patients (Study 4; see CLINICAL STUDIES) are summarized
in the table below.
AVERAGE RAPAMUNE DOSES AND SIROLIMUS
TROUGH CONCENTRATIONS (MEAN ± SD) IN LOW- TO MODERATE-
RISK RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS AFTER MULTIPLE DOSE TABLET ADMINISTRATION
|
|
Rapamune with Cyclosporine Therapya |
Rapamune Following Cyclosporine Withdrawala |
|
|
| Rapamune Dose (mg/day) |
|
|
| Months 4 to 12 |
2.1 ± 0.7 |
8.2 ± 4.2 |
| Months 12 to 24 |
2.0 ± 0.8 |
6.4 ± 3.0 |
| Months 24 to 36 |
2.0 ± 0.8 |
5.3 ± 2.5 |
| Sirolimus Cmin, (ng/mL)b |
|
|
| Months 4 to 12 |
8.6 ± 3.0 |
18.6 ± 4.0 |
| Months 12 to 24 |
9.0 ± 3.3 |
18.0 ± 3.8 |
| Months 24 to 36 |
9.1 ± 3.4 |
16.3 ± 4.3 |
The withdrawal of cyclosporine and concurrent increases
in sirolimus trough concentrations to steady-state required approximately
6 weeks. Larger Rapamune® doses were required due to the absence
of the inhibition of sirolimus metabolism and transport by cyclosporine and
to achieve higher target concentrations during concentration-controlled administration
following cyclosporine withdrawal.
Average Rapamune
doses and sirolimus whole blood trough concentrations for tablets administered
daily in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in high-risk renal
transplant patients (Study 5; see CLINICAL
STUDIES) are summarized in the table below.
AVERAGE RAPAMUNE DOSES AND
SIROLIMUS TROUGH CONCENTRATIONS (MEAN ± SD) IN HIGH-RISK RENAL TRANSPLANT
PATIENTS AFTER MULTIPLE-DOSE TABLET ADMINISTRATION
|
|
Rapamune with Cyclosporine Therapy |
|
|
| Rapamune Dose (mg/day) |
|
| Months 3 to 6 |
5.1 ± 2.4 |
| Months 6 to 9 |
5.1 ± 2.3 |
| Months 9 to 12 |
5.0 ± 2.3 |
| Sirolimus Cmin (ng/mL)a |
|
| Months 3 to 6b |
11.8 ± 4.2 |
| Months 6 to 9c |
11.3 ± 5.2 |
| Months 9 to 12d |
11.2 ± 3.8 |
Special Populations
Hepatic impairment: Sirolimus
oral solution (15 mg) was administered as a single oral dose to 18 subjects
with normal hepatic function and to 18 patients with Child-Pugh classification
A or B hepatic impairment, in which hepatic impairment was primary and not
related to an underlying systemic disease. Shown below
are the mean ± SD pharmacokinetic parameters following the administration
of sirolimus oral solution.
SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS (MEAN ±
SD) IN 18 HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND 18 PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC IMPAIRMENT (15 MG
SINGLE DOSE – ORAL SOLUTION)
| Population |
Cmax,ssa |
tmax |
AUC0-8 |
CL/F/WT |
|
|
(ng/mL) |
(h) |
(ng•h/mL) |
(mL/h/kg) |
|
|
| Healthy subjects |
78.2 ± 18.3 |
0.82 ± 0.17 |
970 ± 272 |
215 ± 76 |
| Hepatic impairment |
77.9 ± 23.1 |
0.84 ± 0.17 |
1567 ± 616 |
144 ± 62 |
Compared with the values in the normal hepatic group, the
hepatic impairment group had higher mean values for sirolimus AUC (61%) and
t1/2 (43%) and had lower mean values for sirolimus CL/F/WT (33%).
The mean t1/2 increased from 79 ± 12 hours in subjects with
normal hepatic function to 113 ± 41 hours in patients with impaired hepatic
function. The rate of absorption of sirolimus was not altered by hepatic disease,
as evidenced by Cmax and tmax values. However, hepatic
diseases with varying etiologies may show different effects and the pharmacokinetics
of sirolimus in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction is unknown. Dosage
adjustment is recommended for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment
(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Renal impairment: The
effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus is not known.
However, there is minimal (2.2%) renal excretion of the drug or its metabolites.
Pediatric: Sirolimus
pharmacokinetic data were collected in concentration-controlled trials of
pediatric renal transplant patients who were also receiving cyclosporine and
corticosteroids. The target ranges for trough concentrations were either 10-20
ng/mL for the 21 children receiving tablets, or 5-15 ng/mL for the one child
receiving oral solution. The children aged 6-11 years (n = 8) received
mean ± SD doses of 1.75 ± 0.71 mg/day (0.064 ± 0.018 mg/kg,
1.65 ± 0.43 mg/m2). The children aged 12-18 years (n = 14)
received mean ± SD doses of 2.79 ± 1.25 mg/day (0.053 ± 0.0150
mg/kg, 1.86 ± 0.61 mg/m2). At the time of sirolimus blood
sampling for pharmacokinetic evaluation, the majority (80%) of these pediatric
patients received the sirolimus dose at 16 hours after the once daily cyclosporine
dose.
SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC
PARAMETERS (MEAN ± SD) IN PEDIATRIC RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS (MULTIPLE
DOSE CONCENTRATION CONTROL)a,b
|
|
Age (y) |
n |
Body weight (kg) |
Cmax,ss (ng/mL) |
tmax,ss (h) |
Cmin,ss (ng/mL) |
AUCt,ss (ng•h/mL)
|
CL/Fc (mL/h/kg) |
CL/Fc (L/h/m2) |
|
|
| 6-11 |
8 |
27 ± 10 |
22.1 ± 8.9 |
5.88 ± 4.05 |
10.6 ± 4.3 |
356 ± 127 |
214 ± 129 |
5.4 ± 2.8 |
| 12-18 |
14 |
52 ± 15 |
34.5 ± 12.2 |
2.7 ± 1.5 |
14.7 ± 8.6 |
466 ± 236 |
136 ± 57 |
4.7 ± 1.9 |
The table below summarizes
pharmacokinetic data obtained in pediatric dialysis patients with chronically
impaired renal function.
SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS (MEAN ± SD) IN PEDIATRIC
PATIENTS WITH STABLE CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE MAINTAINED ON HEMODIALYSIS OR PERITONEAL
DIALYSIS (1, 3, 9, 15 MG/M2 SINGLE DOSE)*
| Age Group (y) |
n |
tmax (h) |
t1/2 (h) |
CL/F (mL/h/kg) |
|
|
| 5-11 |
9 |
1.1 ± 0.5 |
71 ± 40 |
580 ± 450 |
| 12-18 |
11 |
0.79 ± 0.17 |
55 ± 18 |
450 ± 232 |
Geriatric: Clinical
studies of Rapamune did not include a sufficient number of patients >65 years
of age to determine whether they will respond differently than younger patients.
After the administration of Rapamune Oral Solution, sirolimus trough concentration
data in 35 renal transplant patients >65 years of age were similar to those
in the adult population (n = 822) 18 to 65 years of age. Similar
results were obtained after the administration of Rapamune Tablets to 12 renal
transplant patients >65 years of age compared with adults (n = 167) 18 to
65 years of age.
Gender: After
the administration of Rapamune Oral Solution, sirolimus oral dose clearance
in males was 12% lower than that in females; male subjects had a significantly
longer t1/2 than did female subjects (72.3 hours versus 61.3 hours).
A similar trend in the effect of gender on sirolimus oral dose clearance and
t1/2 was observed after the administration of Rapamune Tablets.
Dose adjustments based on gender are not recommended.
Race: In large
phase 3 trials (Studies 1 and 2) using Rapamune Oral Solution and cyclosporine
oral solution (MODIFIED) (e.g., Neoral® Oral Solution) and/or
cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED) (e.g., Neoral® Soft Gelatin
Capsules), there were no significant differences in mean trough sirolimus
concentrations over time between black (n = 139) and non-black (n = 724)
patients during the first 6 months after transplantation at sirolimus doses
of 2 mg/day and 5 mg/day. Similarly, after administration of Rapamune
Tablets (2 mg/day) in a phase III trial, mean sirolimus trough concentrations
over 6 months were not significantly different among black (n = 51) and non-black
(n = 128) patients.
CLINICAL STUDIES
Rapamune® Oral Solution: The safety and efficacy
of Rapamune® Oral Solution for the prevention of organ rejection
following renal transplantation were assessed in two randomized, double-blind,
multicenter, controlled trials. These studies compared two dose levels of
Rapamune Oral Solution (2 mg and 5 mg, once daily) with azathioprine
(Study 1) or placebo (Study 2) when administered in combination with cyclosporine
and corticosteroids. Study 1 was conducted in the United States at 38 sites.
Seven hundred nineteen (719) patients were enrolled in this trial and randomized
following transplantation; 284 were randomized to receive Rapamune Oral Solution
2 mg/day, 274 were randomized to receive Rapamune Oral Solution 5 mg/day,
and 161 to receive azathioprine 2-3 mg/kg/day. Study 2 was conducted
in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the United States, at a total of 34 sites.
Five hundred seventy-six (576) patients were enrolled in this trial and
randomized before transplantation; 227 were randomized to receive Rapamune
Oral Solution 2 mg/day, 219 were randomized to receive Rapamune Oral
Solution 5 mg/day, and 130 to receive placebo. In both studies, the use
of antilymphocyte antibody induction therapy was prohibited. In both studies,
the primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of efficacy failure in the first
6 months after transplantation. Efficacy failure was defined as the first
occurrence of an acute rejection episode (confirmed by biopsy), graft loss,
or death.
The tables below
summarize the results of the primary efficacy analyses from these trials.
Rapamune Oral Solution, at doses of 2 mg/day and 5 mg/day, significantly
reduced the incidence of efficacy failure (statistically significant at the<0.025 level; nominal significance level adjusted for multiple [2] dose
comparisons) at 6 months following transplantation compared with both azathioprine
and placebo.
INCIDENCE
(%) OF EFFICACY FAILURE AT 6 AND 24 MONTHS FOR STUDY 1a,b
| Parameter |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 2 mg/day (n
= 284) |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 5 mg/day (n
= 274) |
Azathioprine 2-3 mg/kg/day (n
= 161) |
|
|
| Efficacy failure at
6 monthsc |
18.7 |
16.8 |
32.3 |
| Components of efficacy
failure |
|
|
|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection |
16.5 |
11.3 |
29.2 |
| Graft loss |
1.1 |
2.9 |
2.5 |
| Death |
0.7 |
1.8 |
0 |
| Lost to follow-up |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
| Efficacy failure at
24 months |
32.8 |
25.9 |
36.0 |
| Components of efficacy
failure |
|
|
|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection |
23.6 |
17.5 |
32.3 |
| Graft loss |
3.9 |
4.7 |
3.1 |
| Death |
4.2 |
3.3 |
0 |
| Lost to follow-up |
1.1 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
INCIDENCE (%)
OF EFFICACY FAILURE AT 6 AND 36 MONTHS FOR STUDY 2a,b
| Parameter |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 2 mg/day (n
= 227) |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 5 mg/day (n
= 219) |
Placebo (n = 130) |
|
|
| Efficacy failure at
6 monthsc |
30.0 |
25.6 |
47.7 |
| Components of efficacy
failure |
|
|
|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection |
24.7 |
19.2 |
41.5 |
| Graft loss |
3.1 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
| Death |
2.2 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
| Lost to follow-up |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Efficacy failure at
36 months |
44.1 |
41.6 |
54.6 |
| Components of efficacy
failure |
|
|
|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection |
32.2 |
27.4 |
43.9 |
| Graft loss |
6.2 |
7.3 |
4.6 |
| Death |
5.7 |
5.9 |
5.4 |
| Lost to follow-up |
0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
Patient and graft survival at 1 year were co-primary endpoints.
The table below shows graft and patient
survival at 1 and 2 years in Study 1 and 1 and 3 years in Study 2. The graft
and patient survival rates were similar in patients treated with Rapamune
and comparator-treated patients.
GRAFT AND PATIENT SURVIVAL (%) FOR STUDY 1 (12 AND
24 MONTHS) AND STUDY 2 (12 AND 36 MONTHS)a,b
| Parameter |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 2 mg/day |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 5 mg/day |
Azathioprine 2-3 mg/kg/day |
Placebo |
|
|
| Study 1 |
(n = 284) |
(n = 274) |
(n = 161) |
|
| Graft survival |
|
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
94.7 |
92.7 |
93.8 |
|
| Month 24 |
85.2 |
89.1 |
90.1 |
|
| Patient survival |
|
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
97.2 |
96.0 |
98.1 |
|
| Month 24 |
92.6 |
94.9 |
96.3 |
|
| Study 2 |
(n = 227) |
(n = 219) |
|
(n = 130) |
| Graft survival |
|
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
89.9 |
90.9 |
|
87.7 |
| Month 36 |
81.1 |
79.9 |
|
80.8 |
| Patient survival |
|
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
96.5 |
95.0 |
|
94.6 |
| Month 36 |
90.3 |
89.5 |
|
90.8 |
The reduction in the incidence of first biopsy-confirmed
acute rejection episodes in patients treated with Rapamune compared with the
control groups included a reduction in all grades of rejection.
In
Study 1, which was prospectively stratified by race within center, efficacy
failure was similar for Rapamune Oral Solution 2 mg/day and lower for
Rapamune Oral Solution 5 mg/day compared with azathioprine in black patients.
In Study 2, which was not prospectively stratified by race, efficacy failure
was similar for both Rapamune Oral Solution doses compared with placebo in
black patients. The decision to use the higher dose of Rapamune Oral Solution
in black patients must be weighed against the increased risk of dose-dependent
adverse events that were observed with the Rapamune Oral Solution 5-mg dose
(see ADVERSE REACTIONS).
PERCENTAGE
OF EFFICACY FAILURE BY RACE AT 6 MONTHSa,b
| Parameter |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 2 mg/day |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 5 mg/day |
Azathioprine 2-3 mg/kg/day |
Placebo |
|
|
| Study 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Black (n = 166) |
34.9 (n = 63) |
18.0 (n = 61) |
33.3 (n = 42) |
|
| Non-black (n = 553) |
14.0 (n = 221) |
16.4 (n = 213) |
31.9 (n = 119) |
|
| Study 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Black (n = 66) |
30.8 (n = 26) |
33.7 (n = 27) |
|
38.5 (n = 13) |
| Non-black (n = 510) |
29.9 (n = 201) |
24.5 (n = 192) |
|
48.7 (n = 117) |
Mean glomerular filtration rates (GFR) post transplant
were calculated by using the Nankivell equation at 12 and 24 months for Study
1, and 12 and 36 months for Study 2. Mean GFR was lower in patients treated
with cyclosporine and Rapamune Oral Solution compared with those treated with
cyclosporine and the respective azathioprine or placebo control.
OVERALL CALCULATED GLOMERULAR
FILTRATION RATES (Mean ± SEM, cc/min) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION POST TRANSPLANTa,b
| Parameter |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 2
mg/day |
Rapamune® Oral Solution 5
mg/day |
Azathioprine 2-3 mg/kg/day |
Placebo |
|
|
| Study 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
57.4 ± 1.3 (n = 269) |
54.6 ± 1.3 (n = 248) |
64.1 ± 1.6) (n = 149) |
|
| Month 24 |
58.4 ± 1.5 (n = 221) |
52.6 ± 1.5 (n = 222) |
62.4 ± 1.9 (n = 132) |
|
| Study 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
52.4 ± 1.5 (n = 211) |
51.5 ± 1.5 (n = 199) |
|
58.0 ± 2.1 (n = 117) |
| Month 36 |
48.1 ± 1.8 (n = 183) |
46.1 ± 2.0 (n = 177) |
|
53.4 ± 2.7 (n = 102) |
Within each treatment group in Studies 1 and 2, mean GFR
at one year post transplant was lower in patients who experienced at least
1 episode of biopsy-proven acute rejection, compared with those who did not.
Renal
function should be monitored and appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppression
regimen should be considered in patients with elevated or increasing serum
creatinine levels (see PRECAUTIONS).
Rapamune® Tablets: The safety and efficacy of Rapamune Oral Solution and Rapamune
Tablets for the prevention of organ rejection following renal transplantation
were compared in a randomized multicenter controlled trial (Study 3). This
study compared a single dose level (2 mg, once daily) of Rapamune Oral
Solution and Rapamune Tablets when administered in combination with cyclosporine
and corticosteroids. The study was conducted at 30 centers in Australia, Canada,
and the United States. Four hundred seventy-seven (477) patients were enrolled
in this study and randomized before transplantation; 238 patients were randomized
to receive Rapamune Oral Solution 2 mg/day and 239 patients were randomized
to receive Rapamune Tablets 2 mg/day. In this study, the use of antilymphocyte
antibody induction therapy was prohibited. The primary efficacy endpoint was
the rate of efficacy failure in the first 3 months after transplantation.
Efficacy failure was defined as the first occurrence of an acute rejection
episode (confirmed by biopsy), graft loss, or death.
The table below summarizes the result of the efficacy
failure analysis at 3 and 6 months from this trial. The overall rate of efficacy
failure at 3 months, the primary endpoint, in the tablet treatment group was
equivalent to the rate in the oral solution treatment group.
INCIDENCE (%) OF EFFICACY
FAILURE AT 3 AND 6 MONTHS: STUDY 3a,b
|
|
Rapamune® Oral Solution (n
= 238) |
Rapamune® Tablets (n
= 239) |
|
|
| Efficacy Failure at
3 monthsc |
23.5 |
24.7 |
| Components of efficacy
failure |
|
|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection |
18.9 |
17.6 |
| Graft loss |
3.4 |
6.3 |
| Death |
1.3 |
0.8 |
| Efficacy Failure at
6 months |
26.1 |
27.2 |
| Components of efficacy
failure |
|
|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection |
21.0 |
19.2 |
| Graft loss |
3.4 |
6.3 |
| Death |
1.7 |
1.7 |
Graft and patient survival at 12 months were co-primary
endpoints. There was no significant difference between the oral solution and
tablet formulations for both graft and patient survival. Graft survival was
92.0% and 88.7% for the oral solution and tablet treatment groups, respectively.
The patient survival rates in the oral solution and tablet treatment groups
were 95.8% and 96.2%, respectively.
The mean GFR at
12 months, calculated by the Nankivell equation, were not significantly different
for the oral solution group and for the tablet group.
The table below summarizes the mean GFR at one-year post-transplantation
for all patients in Study 3 who had serum creatinine measured at 12 months.
OVERALL CALCULATED GLOMERULAR
FILTRATION RATES (CC/MIN) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION AT 12 MONTHS POST TRANSPLANT:
STUDY 3a,b
|
|
Rapamune® Oral Solution |
Rapamune® Tablets |
|
|
| Mean ± SEM |
53.1 ± 1.7 (n = 229) |
51.7 ± 1.7 (n = 225) |
In Study 4 (cyclosporine withdrawal study), the safety
and efficacy of Rapamune as a maintenance regimen were assessed following
cyclosporine withdrawal at 3 to 4 months post renal transplantation. Study
4 was a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial conducted at 57 centers
in Australia, Canada, and Europe. Five hundred twenty-five (525) patients
were enrolled. All patients in this study received the tablet formulation.
This study compared patients who were administered Rapamune, cyclosporine,
and corticosteroids continuously with patients who received the same standardized
therapy for the first 3 months after transplantation (prerandomization period)
followed by the withdrawal of cyclosporine. During cyclosporine withdrawal
the Rapamune dosages were adjusted to achieve targeted sirolimus whole blood
trough concentration ranges (16 to 24 ng/mL until month 12, then 12 to 20
ng/mL thereafter, expressed as chromatographic assay values; see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). At 3 months, 430 patients were equally randomized to either Rapamune
with cyclosporine therapy or Rapamune as a maintenance regimen following cyclosporine
withdrawal.
Eligibility for randomization included
no Banff Grade 3 acute rejection episode or vascular rejection in the 4 weeks
before random assignment; serum creatinine = 4.5 mg/dL; and
adequate renal function to support cyclosporine withdrawal (in the opinion
of the investigator). The primary efficacy endpoint was graft survival at
12 months after transplantation. Secondary efficacy endpoints were the rate
of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, patient survival, incidence of efficacy
failure (defined as the first occurrence of either biopsy-proven acute rejection,
graft loss, or death), and treatment failure (defined as the first occurrence
of either discontinuation, acute rejection, graft loss, or death).
The
safety and efficacy of cyclosporine withdrawal in high-risk patients have
not been adequately studied and it is therefore not recommended. This includes
patients with Banff grade III acute rejection or vascular rejection prior
to cyclosporine withdrawal, those who are dialysis-dependent, serum creatinine
> 4.5 mg/dL, black patients, re-transplants, multi-organ transplants, or patients
with high panel of reactive antibodies (See INDICATIONS AND USAGE).
The
following table summarizes the resulting
graft and patient survival at 12, 24, and 36 months for this trial. At 12,
24, and 36 months, graft and patient survival were similar for both groups.
GRAFT AND PATIENT SURVIVAL
(%): STUDY 4 (CYCLOSPORINE WITHDRAWAL STUDY)a
| Parameter |
Rapamune with Cyclosporine Therapy (n
= 215) |
Rapamune Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal (n
= 215) |
|
|
| Graft Survival |
|
|
| Month 12b |
95.3c |
97.2 |
| Month 24 |
91.6 |
94.0 |
| Month 36d |
87.0 |
91.6 |
| Patient Survival |
|
|
| Month 12 |
97.2 |
98.1 |
| Month 24 |
94.4 |
95.8 |
| Month 36d |
91.6 |
94.0 |
The following table summarizes
the results of first biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 and 36 months.
There was a significant difference in first biopsy-proven rejection between
the two groups during post-randomization through 12 months. Most of the post-randomization
acute rejections occurred in the first 3 months following randomization.
INCIDENCE OF FIRST BIOPSY-PROVEN
ACUTE REJECTION (%) BY TREATMENT GROUP AT 36 MONTHS: STUDY 4 (CYCLOSPORINE
WITHDRAWAL STUDY)a,b
| Period |
Rapamune with Cyclosporine Therapy (n
= 215) |
Rapamune Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal (n
= 215) |
|
|
| Prerandomizationc |
9.3 |
10.2 |
| Postrandomization through
12 monthsc |
4.2 |
9.8 |
| Postrandomization from 12
to 36 months |
1.4 |
0.5 |
| Postrandomization through
36 months |
5.6 |
10.2 |
| Total at 36 months |
14.9 |
20.5 |
Patients receiving renal allografts with = 4 HLA
mismatches experienced significantly higher rates of acute rejection following
randomization to the cyclosporine withdrawal group compared with patients
who continued cyclosporine (15.3% vs 3.0%). Patients receiving renal allografts
with = 3 HLA mismatches, demonstrated similar rates of acute rejection
between treatment groups (6.8% vs 7.7%) following randomization.
The
following table summarizes the mean calculated
GFR in Study 4 (cyclosporine withdrawal study).
CALCULATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATES
(mL/min) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION AT 12, 24, and 36 MONTHS POST TRANSPLANT: STUDY
4 (CYCLOSPORINE WITHDRAWAL STUDY)a, b, c
| Parameter |
Rapamune with Cyclosporine Therapy |
Rapamune Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| Mean ± SEM |
53.2 ± 1.5 n = 208 |
59.3 ± 1.5 n = 203 |
| Month 24 |
|
|
| Mean ± SEM |
48.4 ± 1.7 n = 203 |
58.4 ± 1.6 n = 201 |
| Month 36 |
|
|
| Mean ± SEM |
47.0 ± 1.8 (n = 196) |
58.5 ± 1.9 (n = 199) |
The mean GFR at 12, 24, and 36 months, calculated by the
Nankivell equation, was significantly higher for patients receiving Rapamune
as a maintenance regimen following cyclosporine withdrawal than for those
in the Rapamune with cyclosporine therapy group. Patients who had an acute
rejection prior to randomization had a significantly higher GFR following
cyclosporine withdrawal compared to those in the Rapamune with cyclosporine
group. There was no significant difference in GFR between groups for patients
who experienced acute rejection postrandomization.
Although
the initial protocol was designed for 36 months, there was a subsequent amendment
to extend this study. The results for the cyclosporine withdrawal group at
months 48 and 60 were consistent with the results at month 36. Fifty-two percent
(112/215) of the patients in the Rapamune® with cyclosporine
withdrawal group remained on therapy to month 60 and showed sustained GFR.
High-Risk Patients: Rapamune was studied in a one-year,
clinical trial in high-risk patients (Study 5) who were defined as Black transplant
recipients and/or repeat renal transplant recipients who lost a previous allograft
for immunologic reason and/or patients with high-panel reactive antibodies
(PRA; peak PRA level > 80%). Patients received concentration-controlled sirolimus
and cyclosporine (MODIFIED), and corticosteroids per local practice. Antibody
induction was allowed per protocol as prospectively defined at each transplant
center, and was used in 88.4% of patients. The study was conducted at 35 centers
in the United States. A total of 224 patients received a transplant and at
least one dose of sirolimus and cyclosporine and was comprised of 77.2% Black
patients, 24.1% repeat renal transplant recipients, and 13.5% patients with
high PRA. Efficacy was assessed with the following endpoints, measured at
12 months: efficacy failure (defined as the first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed
acute rejection, graft loss, or death), first occurrence of graft loss or
death, and renal function as measured by the calculated GFR using the Nankivell
formula. The table below summarizes the
results of these endpoints.
EFFICACY FAILURE, GRAFT LOSS OR DEATH AND CALCULATED GLOMERULAR FUNCTION
RATES (mL/min) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION AT 12 MONTHS POST-TRANSPLANT:
STUDY 5
| Parameter |
Rapamune with Cyclosporine, Corticosteroids
(n = 224) |
|
|
| Efficacy Failure (%) |
23.2 |
| Graft Loss or Death (%) |
9.8 |
| Renal Function (mean ± SEM)a,b |
52.6 ± 1.6 (n = 222) |
Patient survival at 12 months was 94.6%. The incidence
of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 17.4% and the majority of the episodes
of acute rejection were mild in severity.
Pediatrics: Rapamune® was
evaluated in a 36-month, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial
at 14 North American centers in pediatric (aged 3 to < 18 years) renal
transplant recipients considered to be at high immunologic risk for developing
chronic allograft nephropathy, defined as a history of one or more acute allograft
rejection episodes and/or the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy on
a renal biopsy. Seventy-eight (78) subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio
to Rapamune® (sirolimus target concentrations of 5 to 15 ng/mL,
by chromatographic assay, n = 53) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor
and corticosteroids or to continue calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive
therapy (n = 25). The primary endpoint of the study was efficacy
failure as defined by the first occurrence of biopsy confirmed acute rejection,
graft loss, or death, and the trial was designed to show superiority of Rapamune® added
to a calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen compared to a calcineurin-inhibitor-based
regimen. The cumulative incidence of efficacy failure up to 36 months was
45.3% in the Rapamune® group compared to 44.0% in the control
group, and did not demonstrate superiority. There was one death in each group.
The use of Rapamune® in combination with calcineurin inhibitors
and corticosteroids was associated with an increased risk of deterioration
of renal function, serum lipid abnormalities (including but not limited to
increased serum triglycerides and cholesterol), and urinary tract infections.
This study does not support the addition of Rapamune® to calcineurin-inhibitor-based
immunosuppressive therapy in this subpopulation of pediatric renal transplant
patients.
INDICATIONS AND USAGE
Rapamune® (sirolimus) is indicated for the
prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years or older receiving
renal transplants.
In patients
at low to moderate immunologic risk, it is recommended that Rapamune
be used initially in a regimen with cyclosporine and corticosteroids; cyclosporine
should be withdrawn 2 to 4 months after transplantation and the Rapamune® dose
should be increased to reach recommended blood concentrations (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Cyclosporine withdrawal has not been studied in patients with
Banff grade III acute rejection or vascular rejection prior to cyclosporine
withdrawal, those who are dialysis-dependent, or with serum creatinine > 4.5
mg/dL, Black patients, re-transplants, multi-organ transplants, or patients
with high-panel reactive antibodies (see CLINICAL STUDIES).
In patients at high immunologic risk (defined as
Black transplant recipients and/or repeat renal transplant recipients who
lost a previous allograft for immunologic reason and/or patients with high-panel
reactive antibodies [PRA; peak PRA level > 80%]), it is recommended that Rapamune
be used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the first
year following transplantation (see CLINICAL
STUDIES, DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). The safety and efficacy of this combination in high-risk patients
have not been studied beyond one year; therefore, after the first year following
transplantation, any adjustments to the immunosuppressive regimen should be
considered on the basis of the clinical status of the patient.
In pediatric patients, the safety and efficacy
of Rapamune® have not been established in patients less than
13 years old, or in pediatric (< 18 years) renal transplant recipients
considered at high immunologic risk (see PRECAUTIONS, Pediatric use, and CLINICAL STUDIES, Pediatrics).
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Rapamune is contraindicated in patients with a hypersensitivity
to sirolimus or its derivatives or any component of the drug product.
WARNINGS
Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development
of lymphoma and other malignancies, particularly of the skin, may result from
immunosuppression (see ADVERSE
REACTIONS). Oversuppression of the immune system can
also increase susceptibility to infection including opportunistic infections,
fatal infections, and sepsis. Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive
therapy and management of organ transplant patients should use Rapamune. Patients
receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with
adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible
for maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the
follow-up of the patient.
Hypersensitivity reactions,
including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema, exfoliative dermatitis,
and hypersensitivity vasculitis, have been associated with the administration
of sirolimus (see ADVERSE
REACTIONS).
As usual for patients
with increased risk for skin cancer, exposure to sunlight and UV light should
be limited by wearing protective clothing and using a sunscreen with a high
protection factor.
Increased serum cholesterol and triglycerides,
that may require treatment, occurred more frequently in patients treated with
Rapamune compared with azathioprine or placebo controls (see PRECAUTIONS).
In
Studies 1 and 2, from month 6 through months 24 and 36, respectively, mean
serum creatinine was increased and mean glomerular filtration rate was decreased
in patients treated with Rapamune and cyclosporine compared with those treated
with cyclosporine and placebo or azathioprine controls. The rate of decline
in renal function was greater in patients receiving Rapamune and cyclosporine
compared with control therapies (see CLINICAL
STUDIES).
Renal function should
be closely monitored during the co-administration of Rapamune® with
cyclosporine because long-term administration of the combination has been
associated with deterioration of renal function. Appropriate adjustment of
the immunosuppression regimen, including discontinuation of Rapamune and/or
cyclosporine, should be considered in patients with elevated or increasing
serum creatinine levels. Caution should be exercised when using other drugs
which are known to impair renal function. In patients at low to moderate immunologic
risk continuation of combination therapy with cyclosporine beyond 4 months
following transplantation should only be considered when the benefits outweigh
the risks of this combination for the individual patients (see PRECAUTIONS).
In
clinical trials, Rapamune has been administered concurrently with corticosteroids
and with cyclosporine. The formulations of cyclosporine include:
-
- Sandimmune® Injection (cyclosporine
injection)
Sandimmune® Oral Solution (cyclosporine oral
solution)
Sandimmune® Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine
capsules)
Neoral® Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine
capsules [MODIFIED])
Neoral® Oral Solution (cyclosporine
oral solution [MODIFIED])
The efficacy and safety of the use of Rapamune in combination
with other immunosuppressive agents has not been determined.
Liver Transplantation –
Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT):
The
use of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus was associated with excess
mortality and graft loss in a study in de novo liver transplant recipients.
Many of these patients had evidence of infection at or near the time of death.
In
this and another study in de novo liver transplant recipients, the use of
sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus was associated with
an increase in HAT; most cases of HAT occurred within 30 days post-transplantation
and most led to graft loss or death.
Lung Transplantation –
Bronchial Anastomotic Dehiscence:
Cases of
bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in de novo
lung transplant patients when sirolimus has been used as part of an immunosuppressive
regimen.
The safety and efficacy of Rapamune® (sirolimus)
as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant
patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended.
Co-administration of sirolimus with strong inhibitors of
CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin,
telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or strong inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp
(such as rifampin or rifabutin) is not recommended (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Metabolism, and PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions and Other drug
interactions).
PRECAUTIONS
General
Rapamune is intended for oral administration only.
Fluid Accumulation and Wound Healing
mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus have been shown in vitro
to inhibit production of certain growth factors that may affect angiogenesis,
fibroblast proliferation, and vascular permeability.
There
have been reports of impaired or delayed wound healing in patients receiving
Rapamune, including lymphocele and wound dehiscence (see Adverse
Reactions, Other clinical experience). Lymphocele, a known surgical
complication of renal transplantation, occurred significantly more often in
a dose-related fashion in patients treated with Rapamune. Appropriate measures
should be considered to minimize such complications. Patients with a body
mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 may be at increased risk
of abnormal wound healing based on data from the medical literature.
There
have also been reports of fluid accumulation, including peripheral edema,
lymphedema, pleural effusion and pericardial effusions (including hemodynamically
significant effusions in children and adults), in patients receiving Rapamune.
Lipids
The use of Rapamune® in renal transplant
patients was associated with increased serum cholesterol and triglycerides
that may require treatment.
In Studies 1 and 2, in de novo renal transplant recipients who began
the study with normal, fasting, total serum cholesterol (<200 mg/dL) or
normal, fasting, total serum triglycerides (<200 mg/dL), there was
an increased incidence of hypercholesterolemia (fasting serum cholesterol
>240 mg/dL) or hypertriglyceridemia (fasting serum triglycerides >500 mg/dL),
respectively, in patients receiving both Rapamune® 2 mg and
Rapamune® 5 mg compared with azathioprine and placebo controls.
Treatment
of new-onset hypercholesterolemia with lipid-lowering agents was required
in 42 - 52% of patients enrolled in the Rapamune arms of Studies
1 and 2 compared with 16% of patients in the placebo arm and 22% of patients
in the azathioprine arm.
In Study 4 (cyclosporine withdrawal
study) during the prerandomization period, mean fasting serum cholesterol
and triglyceride values rapidly increased, and peaked at 2 months with mean
cholesterol values > 240 mg/dL and triglycerides > 250 mg/dL. After randomization
mean cholesterol and triglyceride values remained higher in the cyclosporine
withdrawal arm compared to the Rapamune® and cyclosporine
combination.
Renal transplant patients have a higher
prevalence of clinically significant hyperlipidemia. Accordingly, the risk/benefit
should be carefully considered in patients with established hyperlipidemia
before initiating an immunosuppressive regimen including Rapamune.
Any
patient who is administered Rapamune should be monitored for hyperlipidemia
using laboratory tests and if hyperlipidemia is detected, subsequent interventions
such as diet, exercise, and lipid-lowering agents, as outlined by the National
Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, should be initiated.
In
clinical trials, the concomitant administration of Rapamune and HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitors and/or fibrates appeared to be well tolerated.
During
Rapamune therapy with cyclosporine, patients administered an HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor and/or fibrate should be monitored for the possible development
of rhabdomyolysis and other adverse effects as described in the respective
labeling for these agents.
Renal Function
Patients treated with cyclosporine and Rapamune were noted
to have higher serum creatinine levels and lower glomerular filtration rates
compared with patients treated with cyclosporine and placebo or azathioprine
controls (Studies 1 and 2). The rate of decline in renal function in these
studies was greater in patients receiving Rapamune and cyclosporine compared
with control therapies. In patients at low to moderate immunologic risk (See CLINICAL STUDIES)
continuation of combination therapy with cyclosporine beyond 4 months following
transplantation should only be considered when the benefits outweigh the risks
of this combination for the individual patients. (see WARNINGS).
Renal
function should be monitored during the administration of Rapamune® in
combination with cyclosporine. Appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppression
regimen, including discontinuation of Rapamune and/or cyclosporine, should
be considered in patients with elevated or increasing serum creatinine levels.
Caution should be exercised when using agents (e.g., aminoglycosides, and
amphotericin B) that are known to have a deleterious effect on renal function.
In
patients with delayed graft function, Rapamune may delay recovery of renal
function.
Proteinuria
In a study evaluating conversion from calcineurin inhibitors
to sirolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients 6-120 months post-transplant,
increased urinary protein excretion was commonly observed from 6 through 24
months after conversion to Rapamune. In general, those patients with the greatest
amount of urinary protein excretion prior to sirolimus conversion were those
whose protein excretion increased the most after conversion. New onset of
nephrotic proteinuria was also reported. Reduction in the degree of urinary
protein excretion was observed following discontinuation of sirolimus. Periodic
quantitative monitoring of urinary protein excretion is recommended. The safety
and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to Rapamune in maintenance
renal transplant population has not been established.
De Novo Use Without Cyclosporine
The safety and efficacy of de novo use of Rapamune without
cyclosporine is not established in renal transplant patients. In a multi-center
clinical study, de novo renal transplant patients treated with Rapamune, MMF,
steroids, and an IL-2 receptor antagonist had significantly higher acute rejection
rates and numerically higher death rates compared to patients treated with
cyclosporine, MMF, steroids, and IL-2 receptor antagonist. A benefit, in terms
of better renal function, was not apparent in the treatment arm with de novo
use of Rapamune without cyclosporine. These findings were also observed in
a similar treatment group of another clinical trial.
Calcineurin inhibitor-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic
thrombocytopenic purpura/thrombotic microangiopathy (HUS/TTP/TMA)
The concomitant use of sirolimus with a calcineurin inhibitor
may increase the risk of calcineurin inhibitor-induced HUS/TTP/TMA.
Angioedema
Rapamune has been associated with the development of angioedema.
The concomitant use of Rapamune with other drugs known to cause angioedema,
such as ACE-inhibitors, may increase the risk of developing angioedema.
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia have been reported in patients not receiving antimicrobial
prophylaxis. Therefore, antimicrobial prophylaxis for Pneumocystis
carinii pneumonia should be administered for 1 year following transplantation.
Cytomegalovirus
(CMV) prophylaxis is recommended for 3 months after transplantation, particularly
for patients at increased risk for CMV disease.
Interstitial Lung Disease
Cases of interstitial lung disease (including pneumonitis,
and infrequently bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia [BOOP] and
pulmonary fibrosis), some fatal, with no identified infectious etiology have
occurred in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens including Rapamune.
In some cases, the interstitial lung disease has resolved upon discontinuation
or dose reduction of Rapamune. The risk may be increased as the trough Rapamune
concentration increases (see ADVERSE
REACTIONS, Other clinical experience).
Information for Patients
Patients should be given complete dosage instructions (see Patient Instructions).
Women of childbearing potential should be informed of the potential risks
during pregnancy and that they should use effective contraception prior to
initiation of Rapamune therapy, during Rapamune therapy and for 12 weeks after
Rapamune therapy has been stopped (see PRECAUTIONS: Pregnancy).
Patients
should be told that exposure to sunlight and UV light should be limited by
wearing protective clothing and using a sunscreen with a high protection factor
because of the increased risk for skin cancer (see WARNINGS).
Laboratory Tests
Whole blood sirolimus concentrations should be monitored
in patients receiving concentration-controlled Rapamune. Monitoring is also
necessary in patients likely to have altered drug metabolism, in patients=13 years who weigh less than 40 kg, in patients with hepatic
impairment, and during concurrent administration of potent CYP3A4 inducers
and inhibitors (see PRECAUTIONS:
Drug Interactions).
Drug Interactions
Sirolimus is known to be a substrate for both cytochrome
CYP3A4 and P-gp. The pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and concomitantly
administered drugs is discussed below. Drug interaction studies have not been
conducted with drugs other than those described below.
Cyclosporine capsules MODIFIED:
Cyclosporine is a substrate and
inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp.
Because
of the effect of cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED), it is recommended that
sirolimus should be taken 4 hours after administration of cyclosporine oral
solution (MODIFIED) and/or cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED) (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Studies assessing the effect of concomitant
administration of cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED) with sirolimus oral solution
and with sirolimus tablets are summarized below.
Rapamune Oral Solution: In
a single dose drug-drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers were administered
10 mg sirolimus either simultaneously or 4 hours after a 300 mg
dose of Neoral® Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules
[MODIFIED]). For simultaneous administration, the mean Cmax and
AUC of sirolimus were increased by 116% and 230%, respectively, relative to
administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 4 hours after Neoral® Soft
Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) administration, sirolimus
Cmax and AUC were increased by 37% and 80%, respectively, compared
with administration of sirolimus alone.
In a single-dose
cross-over drug-drug interaction study, 33 healthy volunteers received 5 mg
sirolimus alone, 2 hours before, and 2 hours after a 300 mg dose of Neoral® Soft
Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). When given 2 hours before
Neoral® Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED])
administration, sirolimus Cmax and AUC were comparable to those
with administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 2 hours after,
the mean Cmax and AUC of sirolimus were increased by 126% and 141%,
respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone.
Mean
cyclosporine Cmax and AUC were not significantly affected when
sirolimus was given simultaneously or when administered 4 hours after Neoral® Soft
Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). However, after multiple-dose
administration of sirolimus given 4 hours after Neoral® in
renal post-transplant patients over 6 months, cyclosporine oral-dose clearance
was reduced, and lower doses of Neoral® Soft Gelatin Capsules
(cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) were needed to maintain target cyclosporine
concentration.
Rapamune Tablets: In
a single-dose drug-drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers were administered
10 mg sirolimus (Rapamune Tablets) either simultaneously or 4 hours
after a 300-mg dose of Neoral® Soft Gelatin Capsules
(cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). For simultaneous administration, mean
Cmax and AUC were increased by 512% and 148%, respectively,
relative to administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 4 hours
after cyclosporine administration, sirolimus Cmax and AUC were
both increased by only 33% compared with administration of sirolimus
alone.
Cyclosporine oral solution: In
a multiple-dose study in 150 psoriasis patients, sirolimus 0.5, 1.5,
and 3 mg/m2/day was administered simultaneously with Sandimmune® Oral
Solution (cyclosporine Oral Solution) 1.25 mg/kg/day. The increase in
average sirolimus trough concentrations ranged between 67% to 86% relative
to when sirolimus was administered without cyclosporine. The intersubject
variability (%CV) for sirolimus trough concentrations ranged from 39.7% to
68.7%. There was no significant effect of multiple-dose sirolimus on cyclosporine
trough concentrations following Sandimmune® Oral Solution
(cyclosporine oral solution) administration. However, the %CV was higher (range
85.9% - 165%) than those from previous studies.
Sandimmune® Oral
Solution (cyclosporine oral solution) is not bioequivalent to Neoral® Oral
Solution (cyclosporine oral solution MODIFIED), and should not be used interchangeably.
Although there is no published data comparing Sandimmune® Oral
Solution (cyclosporine oral solution) to SangCya® Oral Solution
(cyclosporine oral solution [MODIFIED]), they should not be used interchangeably.
Likewise, Sandimmune® Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine
capsules) are not bioequivalent to Neoral® Soft Gelatin Capsules
(cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) and should not be used interchangeably.
Diltiazem: Diltiazem
is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; sirolimus concentrations
should be monitored and a dose adjustment may be necessary. The simultaneous
oral administration of 10 mg of sirolimus oral solution and 120 mg
of diltiazem to 18 healthy volunteers significantly affected the bioavailability
of sirolimus. Sirolimus Cmax, tmax, and AUC were increased
1.4-, 1.3-, and 1.6-fold, respectively. Sirolimus did not affect the pharmacokinetics
of either diltiazem or its metabolites desacetyldiltiazem and desmethyldiltiazem.
Erythromycin: Erythromycin
is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; co-administration of sirolimus
oral solution or tablets and erythromycin is not recommended (see WARNINGS). The
simultaneous oral administration of 2 mg daily of sirolimus oral solution
and 800 mg q 8h of erythromycin as erythromycin ethylsuccinate tablets at
steady state to 24 healthy volunteers significantly affected the bioavailability
of sirolimus and erythromycin. Sirolimus Cmax and AUC were increased
4.4- and 4.2-fold respectively and tmax was increased by 0.4 hr.
Erythromycin Cmax and AUC were increased 1.6- and 1.7-fold, respectively,
and tmax was increased by 0.3 hr.
Ketoconazole: Ketoconazole
is a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; co-administration of sirolimus oral
solution or tablets and ketoconazole is not recommended (see WARNINGS). Multiple-dose ketoconazole
administration significantly affected the rate and extent of absorption and
sirolimus exposure after administration of Rapamune® Oral
Solution, as reflected by increases in sirolimus Cmax, tmax,
and AUC of 4.3-fold, 38%, and 10.9-fold, respectively. However, the terminal
t1/2 of sirolimus was not changed. Single-dose sirolimus did not
affect steady-state 12-hour plasma ketoconazole concentrations.
Rifampin: Rifampin is
a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and P-gp; co-administration of sirolimus oral solution
or tablets and rifampin is not recommended (see WARNINGS). Pretreatment of 14 healthy
volunteers with multiple doses of rifampin, 600 mg daily for 14 days,
followed by a single 20-mg dose of sirolimus oral solution, greatly increased
sirolimus oral-dose clearance by 5.5-fold (range = 2.8 to 10), which represents
mean decreases in AUC and Cmax of about 82% and 71%, respectively.
In patients where rifampin is indicated, alternative therapeutic agents with
less enzyme induction potential should be considered.
Verapamil: Verapamil
is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; sirolimus concentrations
should be monitored and a dose adjustment may be necessary. The simultaneous
oral administration of 2 mg daily of sirolimus oral solution and 180 mg q
12h of verapamil at steady state to 26 healthy volunteers significantly affected
the bioavailability of sirolimus and verapamil. Sirolimus Cmax and
AUC were increased 2.3- and 2.2-fold, respectively, without substantial change
in tmax. The Cmax and AUC of the pharmacologically active
S(-) enantiomer of verapamil were both increased 1.5-fold and tmax was
decreased by 1.2 hr.
Drugs which may be coadministered without dose adjustment
Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions
were not observed in studies of drugs listed below. A synopsis of the type
of study performed for each drug is provided. Sirolimus and these drugs may
be coadministered without dose adjustments.
Acyclovir: Acyclovir,
200 mg, was administered once daily for 3 days followed by a single 10-mg
dose of sirolimus oral solution on day 3 in 20 adult healthy volunteers.
Atorvastatin: Atorvastatin,
20 mg, was given daily for 10 days to 23 healthy volunteers, followed
by a combined regimen of sirolimus oral solution, 2 mg, and atorvastatin,
20 mg, for 5 days.
Digoxin: Digoxin, 0.25 mg,
was administered daily for 8 days and a single 10-mg dose of sirolimus oral
solution was given on day 8 to 24 healthy volunteers.
Glyburide: A single 5-mg
dose of glyburide and a single 10-mg dose of sirolimus oral solution were
administered to 24 healthy volunteers. Sirolimus did not affect the hypoglycemic
action of glyburide.
Nifedipine: A single
60-mg dose of nifedipine and a single 10-mg dose of sirolimus oral solution
were administered to 24 healthy volunteers.
Norgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (Lo/Ovral®): Sirolimus oral solution, 2 mg, was given
daily for 7 days to 21 healthy female volunteers on norgestrel/ethinyl
estradiol.
Prednisolone: Pharmacokinetic
information was obtained from 42 stable renal transplant patients receiving
daily doses of prednisone (5-20 mg/day) and either single or multiple
doses of sirolimus oral solution (0.5-5 mg/m2 q 12h).
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Bactrim®): A single oral dose of sulfamethoxazole (400 mg)/trimethoprim
(80 mg) was given to 15 renal transplant patients receiving daily oral
doses of sirolimus (8 to 25 mg/m2).
Other Drug Interactions
Co-administration of sirolimus with strong inhibitors of
CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin,
telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or strong inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp
(such as rifampin or rifabutin) is not recommended (see WARNINGS). Sirolimus is extensively
metabolized by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme in the intestinal wall and liver and undergoes
counter-transport from enterocytes of the small intestine into the gut lumen
by the P-gp drug efflux pump. Sirolimus is potentially recycled between enterocytes
and the gut lumen to allow continued metabolism by CYP3A4. Therefore, absorption
and the subsequent elimination of systemically absorbed sirolimus may be influenced
by drugs that affect these proteins. Strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp
significantly decrease the metabolism of sirolimus and increase sirolimus
concentrations, while strong inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp significantly increase
the metabolism of sirolimus and decrease sirolimus concentrations.
In
patients in whom strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 are indicated, alternative
therapeutic agents with less potential for inhibition or induction of CYP3A4
should be considered.
Sirolimus is a substrate f